Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Worm Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Talk:Power Classifications
(section)
Add topic
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== To-do list == Ok, so the Power classifications page, and the new sub-pages are looking good I think, but there's still work to be done, and I thought it might be a good idea to make a quick inventory. If you feel something else needs doing feel free to add it in, it wouldn't surprise if I forgot something. [[User:RainDance299|RainDance299]] ([[User talk:RainDance299|talk]]) 13:33, October 24, 2016 (UTC) *<u>'''Combinations with other ratings'''</u>: I made a quick (uncited) example on the [[Mover]] page so you can sort of see were this is going: basically take the most common combinations (Blaster/Shaker, Changer/Stranger, Master/Stranger, etc) and describe how they generally manifest, while also mentioning how the rating appears as a secondary rating. It shouldn't be a complete description of all the different combinations (unless you want to create a whole new page for it all). I fear this section might be more challenging then it appears at first, mostly because lack of proper cites available to us. **The sections should probably be renamed to '''Common combinations with other ratings'''. **<strike>[[Mover]] - Needs cites.</strike> Done! **[[Shaker]] - **<strike>[[Brute]]</strike> - Done! **<strike>[[Breaker]] - Needs cites.</strike> Done? **<strike>[[Master]]</strike> - Done! **[[Tinker]] - Probably the easiest (?) **<strike>[[Blaster]]</strike> - Done! **<strike>[[Thinker]]</strike> - Done! **[[Striker]] - **[[Changer]] - **<strike>[[Trump]]</strike> - Trump powers seem to be so varied that's it's impossible to make any general statements. Maybe someone has some ideas? **<strike>[[Stranger]] - Be sure to check out [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CykV5BgK2EFY4v_cuUXJFpU1Ye3mIRV-VaHEUZxZO4k/edit STRANGERS].</strike> Done! *<u>'''Citations'''</u>: **<strike>Some citations need to have proper quotes attached, mostly those leading to the Detail Generator spreadsheet.</strike> - Done! **<strike>Some quotes had their formatting killed by being copy-pasted from their original text, that's something that needs fixing - (it might be best if that's something that I do myself, since I actually have some memory of what the quote looked like before).</strike> - Done! **<u>'''Format:'''</u> I mostly used [Quote] - [Source (with outside link)], and tried to use that consistently. If someone has reason for another system, please post about it. At the very least, we should be sure that the same format is used across each page. **On the power classifications page, the part about sub-classifications has very weak cites. If anyone has a better source, that would be amazing. **There's other weak cites. If you find them and have something better, please add it in! *<u>'''Known classifications'''</u>: I'm sure I have missed a few. Please add them in if have a proper cite for them. Please don't add them if you don't have a proper cite for them. **(I know the following is tempting: "''[[Legend]] is a [[Mover]]! That's just so obvious! Look here's a quote in which he flies!''" but there's loads of people that think it's obvious that [[Victor]] is a [[Trump]], and that [[Glory Girl]]'s aura is a [[Master]] power, etc. Debating each and every cape in Worm... Nope. Cite or go home.) **If you find the template hard to edit properly, feel free to place your information here or on the Template's talk page: someone will fit in the information properly. **I think we should give priority here to A. Highly significant characters ([[Endbringers]], <strike>[[Eidolon]]</strike>, etc.) and B. Characters with unique powers and/or unique ratings (Those would give the most new information). **Integrating the [Edit] button properly. (No idea how). *<strike><u>'''Speculated classifications'''</u>: I added this section originally to preserve capes placed on the original lists but I lacked quotes for, but I think we should just cut it, since it's all speculations right now.</strike> - Done! **<strike>[[Lustrum]] and [[Khun Sa]] have [[Breaker]] forms, but that's not enough to earn a Breaker rating (see [[Grumman]]). Perhaps a quick note at the bottom of the page for them?</strike> - Fossillord provided a source to about Grumman that changed my mind about this. All three are now part of the table. *<strike>Table of (classification) Types: See the [[Tinker]] page: The list of hyperspecialist, focal tinker, etc. The same could be done for:</strike> **<strike>[[Brute]] - Done!</strike> **<strike>[[Blaster]] - Done!</strike> **<strike>[[Thinker]] - Done! </strike> **<strike>[[Trump]] - Done!</strike> - Done! *[[Shifter]] now has its own page. If you have any information or cites, please add it.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Worm Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Worm Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)