Jump to content

Talk:Gold Coin: Difference between revisions

Add topic
From Worm Wiki
RainDance299 (talk | contribs)
Created page with "I have checked the pages for each member, and they don't contain any information this page doesn't. I propose to delete them and simple linking to this article until someone s..."
Tag: rte-wysiwyg
 
RainDance299 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tag: sourceedit
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I have checked the pages for each member, and they don't contain any information this page doesn't. I propose to delete them and simple linking to this article until someone see fit to extend them. [[User:RainDance299|RainDance299]] ([[User talk:RainDance299|talk]]) 23:24, November 9, 2016 (UTC)
I have checked the pages for each member, and they don't contain any information this page doesn't. I propose to delete them and simple linking to this article until someone see fit to extend them. [[User:RainDance299|RainDance299]] ([[User talk:RainDance299|talk]]) 23:24, November 9, 2016 (UTC)
OK bye me and thanks for asking, but do not touch the category tabs and use these <nowiki><!-- --></nowiki> on the info itself, do not delete fully. There is likly going to be expansion later, if rumors of things starting up again are true. And if not I will likly be adding them. Swing by IRC #Wiki and I will see if I can fill you in on long term plans. --[[User:FossilLord|FossilLord]] ([[User talk:FossilLord|talk]]) 00:54, November 10, 2016 (UTC)
I'm OK with deleting them entirely, but FossilLord has a good point that separate articles leaves more room for expansion.
It is probably best to standardise. Pick one rule for all of them, remove most of the duplicate material, put in links and redirects to the "correct" location. Then if there's reason to change our minds, they can all be moved together.
In fact, here:
<poll>
Which location should Gold Coin member details be in?
Anchorage Characters page
Gold Coin page
Individual articles
</poll>
--[[User:MugaSofer|MugaSofer]] ([[User Talk:MugaSofer|talk]]) 13:55, November 11, 2016 (UTC)
I think you both underestimate how minor these characters are. I can't actually find an on-screen appearance for any of them, so I'm not sure the articles actually can be expended. Gold Coin is mentioned as a group in the background a few times, but that's it. [[User:RainDance299|RainDance299]] ([[User talk:RainDance299|talk]]) 23:58, November 11, 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:58, November 11, 2016

I have checked the pages for each member, and they don't contain any information this page doesn't. I propose to delete them and simple linking to this article until someone see fit to extend them. RainDance299 (talk) 23:24, November 9, 2016 (UTC)

OK bye me and thanks for asking, but do not touch the category tabs and use these <!-- --> on the info itself, do not delete fully. There is likly going to be expansion later, if rumors of things starting up again are true. And if not I will likly be adding them. Swing by IRC #Wiki and I will see if I can fill you in on long term plans. --FossilLord (talk) 00:54, November 10, 2016 (UTC)

I'm OK with deleting them entirely, but FossilLord has a good point that separate articles leaves more room for expansion.

It is probably best to standardise. Pick one rule for all of them, remove most of the duplicate material, put in links and redirects to the "correct" location. Then if there's reason to change our minds, they can all be moved together.

In fact, here:

<poll> Which location should Gold Coin member details be in? Anchorage Characters page Gold Coin page Individual articles </poll> --MugaSofer (talk) 13:55, November 11, 2016 (UTC)

I think you both underestimate how minor these characters are. I can't actually find an on-screen appearance for any of them, so I'm not sure the articles actually can be expended. Gold Coin is mentioned as a group in the background a few times, but that's it. RainDance299 (talk) 23:58, November 11, 2016 (UTC)