Talk:Interlude 26: Difference between revisions
FossilLord (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
FossilLord (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[Special:Contributions/96.84.217.101|96.84.217.101]] 19:03, July 31, 2017 (UTC) | [[Special:Contributions/96.84.217.101|96.84.217.101]] 19:03, July 31, 2017 (UTC) | ||
* <nowiki><ref name="I1 c1"></nowiki>Pinkhair:<br>Something’s been bothering me for a while. Why did they assume that his answer was ‘Scion,’ a non-Russian word. If he understood the question, why would he be assumed to correctly answer in another language?<br><br>Heck, maybe he was claiming to be Psionic(Psion). Or a Dan Brown style fictional descendant of Christ(Sion). With hesitation and pauses, it might have been one or multiple words…<br><br>Perhaps a better question is, IS that what the world assumes, or is that not the prevailing theory throughout the world? I can imagine the Russians having a different view.<br><br>Probably shouldn’t be thinking about this near 7 am on a work day.<br><br>wildbow:<br>It’s a prevailing theory, helped by the fact that English is a language that reaches across the globe.<br><br>Still, it’s funny you mention that… 😉 - conversation on [[Interlude 1]]</ref> | *<nowiki><ref name="I1 c1"></nowiki>Pinkhair:<br>Something’s been bothering me for a while. Why did they assume that his answer was ‘Scion,’ a non-Russian word. If he understood the question, why would he be assumed to correctly answer in another language?<br><br>Heck, maybe he was claiming to be Psionic(Psion). Or a Dan Brown style fictional descendant of Christ(Sion). With hesitation and pauses, it might have been one or multiple words…<br><br>Perhaps a better question is, IS that what the world assumes, or is that not the prevailing theory throughout the world? I can imagine the Russians having a different view.<br><br>Probably shouldn’t be thinking about this near 7 am on a work day.<br><br>wildbow:<br>It’s a prevailing theory, helped by the fact that English is a language that reaches across the globe.<br><br>Still, it’s funny you mention that… 😉 - conversation on [[Interlude 1.x]]</ref> | ||
There you can add it yourself.--[[User:FossilLord|FossilLord]] ([[User talk:FossilLord|talk]]) 20:47, July 31, 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:52, May 14, 2018
This is not the first chapter where Scion's real name is revealed to be Zion. That happens in Kevin Norton's interlude, 18.x.
96.84.217.101 19:03, July 31, 2017 (UTC)
- <ref name="I1 c1">Pinkhair:
Something’s been bothering me for a while. Why did they assume that his answer was ‘Scion,’ a non-Russian word. If he understood the question, why would he be assumed to correctly answer in another language?
Heck, maybe he was claiming to be Psionic(Psion). Or a Dan Brown style fictional descendant of Christ(Sion). With hesitation and pauses, it might have been one or multiple words…
Perhaps a better question is, IS that what the world assumes, or is that not the prevailing theory throughout the world? I can imagine the Russians having a different view.
Probably shouldn’t be thinking about this near 7 am on a work day.
wildbow:
It’s a prevailing theory, helped by the fact that English is a language that reaches across the globe.
Still, it’s funny you mention that… 😉 - conversation on Interlude 1.x</ref>
There you can add it yourself.--FossilLord (talk) 20:47, July 31, 2017 (UTC)